Revenge of the Castanets

June 12, 2007

Television Interlude or I See Dead Shows

Filed under: Film & TV — flann4 @ 5:10 pm

Just watched most of the first episode of John from Cincinnati (a new HBO series from David Milch (behind the superlative Deadwood) and Kem Nunn (wrote some passable beach quasi-mystery novels quite a while ago)). This is a surfing/mystery/supernatural/drama/soap (and aren’t almost all current dramas soaps in one way or another these days…another signifier of the rise of unwarranted sentimentalism in everyday media?) which had some absolutely stunning shots; like a classic western set on the coast but with phenomenally bad casting. Several generations of a dysfunctional surfing family form the basic community of this narrative into which a seemingly brain damaged character floats, and in his wake, supernatural events happen (one man finds himself floating a few inches above the ground, a dead bird comes back to life after being touched by a boy). This cipher of a character is the most egregious error of this show in that he is has all the charisma of a used dish rag…imagine Keanu with a lobotomy and on depressants.

I watched this in that strange state of “this is really hard to define” and “I don’t know if this is good or bad” until I arrived at the ‘no, another few minutes of my life gone forever” stage. I think they were trying to mix Twin Peaks with surfers. And I kept it on the screen as long as I did because the visuals were stunning. But pretty pictures do not a good show make. On further contemplation I think I know what really bothers me about these kinds of shows.

Always a big fan of the unusual and the attempts at strange, I loved Twin Peaks. But as odd as Twin Peaks was, it managed to convey strangeness and alternative realities without introducing the supernatural. Maybe I’m siding with Horatio rather than Hamlet in this respect but I like my fiction relatively ghost-free. The Sopranos shows what riches there are to be had in the quotidian and the operatic when properly combined (or Deadwood, or Rome) or the great crime based thrillers Shield, the Wire, Homicide, Oz. For me, those have been the great dramas of television so far, and there are no wizards or special powers there.

Don’t get me wrong. These are good times for super heros (the last couple of years have seen the best Superman and Batman movies yet; a couple of the Xmen movies are good, and I am really hoping the Silver Surfer takes the really bad taste that still lingers in my mouth from the Fantastic Four movie). But I could it be, to paraphrase the Nicholson quote, too many writers just can’t handle the truth; they’re not good enough to do reality. (To be fair it’s probably the developers more than the writers.) How many shows do we need where people see the dead, have visions, have powers? I have to think that this means something about our times beyond just the poverty of the writers and developers. Does it mirror the resurgence of the born against down south of us? Is it because deep down we think the world is lost, and only fantasies will assuage the pain (like movies in the depression)? Is it the natural reaction to a growing sense of individual powerlessness?

I don’t know. I do know that just as the Sopranos lives on in my head, as Tony and company join the other fully formed characters in my borrowed mythologies, they have come this close to me because they are bound by the rules of reality as much as they embody dreams.

5 Comments »

  1. Okay Ass, you knew that was gonna get a comment out of me. Why do you, and others, insist on making fantasy a genre of it’s own, that is completely unrelated to the way other writing works?

    What the fuck is the difference between a writer trying to present reality and real human issues through a fantasy world and a writer trying to present those things through a world that presents a civilization that was long lost to us and about whose daily life and human interactions we know virtually nothing (like Rome)? The answer is, there is no fucking difference!

    So really I’m not sure why people liking fantasy means something is amiss in today’s society when people liking historical fiction apparently does not mean this. Both are fantasy, both are escapism, both are trying to present human interaction through fantastic scenarios. And I would argue that the Sopranos does the same as really, for how many of us is the gangster life of killing and torturing a reality? We liked the show because the character portrayals seemed real to us, not because it was actually a realistic show.

    Why is liking the fantasy and disturbing as hell violence of this show not an indication of a disturbed society, but people liking Buffy and Heroes is? Huh? Tell me that Ass.

    Comment by tania — June 12, 2007 @ 11:17 pm

  2. I know I might be misreading this but it sounds as though you are just a little annoyed. But I am not going to back down on this one. As you know I do love a good fantasy from time to time and have been a big fan of scifi from way back and I think the good stuff is as good as any other good stuff. Every genre has merit and the potential of greatness (and not only the potential). However.

    However, it is fundamentally different just as androids are fundamentally different from humans. Though the world of the Sopranos or Shakespearean drama or Dylan Thomas or Ernest Hemingway is composed of some elements that will likely never be part of my direct experience, they are all made up of the same building blocks that make up my experience of the world. These people are subject to exactly the same physical laws (I realize that some of Shakespeare might not exactly correspond to this) that govern us.

    The reason I am throwing out my conjecture about a paucity of imagination (because resorting to fantasy can be just that) is not that there are fantasies or shows like Heroes (which I promoted from the start) but the sheer number of them. Just the same as there are too many remakes out there. A few is always good but too many indicate that something is a little out of balance.

    Before this otherworld tilt was a “big intrusive government agencies” tilt which was no better (24, Alias, Vegas, etc). Its not the genre so much as the proportion.

    Comment by aos — June 13, 2007 @ 12:13 am

  3. Oh just on a rant, you know me. It takes very little to get the ire going :)

    First: If you are making the point that too much of anything is a bad thing, then say that, don’t just say “too much of fantasy” is a bad thing. But I would say the obsession with reality tv far outways the fantasy - there really aren’t that many fantasy shows out there honeybunches, check your stats before you spew forth. What is it, like three major shows Battlestar, this one you mentioned, and Heroes? That doesn’t count as an overabundance. I don’t own a tv, but those are the only ones I hear about, therefore the only ones that must be “major”I don’t buy it when you pull stuff out of that steely ass of yours, remember? Reality tv is the still the biggie - if you wanna analyze what’s wrong with society for wanting too much of some type of show, analyze why society is so obsessed with home/people make-overs and home renos. That’s where the fucking overabundance lies. Not to mention the paucity of imagination.

    Second: Your argument that the characters that are in fantasy worlds do not have the same building blocks that make up your experience is just plain dumb. Most fantasy/sci fi deals with humans going through something very real (alcholism, divorce, dealing with being isolated blah blah blah) that comes exactly from these so called building blocks. The characters grow up with parents, issues, the whole deal. The only thing that’s different is the setting, it’s this larger than life setting symbolizes how the rest of our lives can seem so overwhelming when we’re trying to deal with daily shit like our families, daughters, death etc (hello? anyone thinking of the Sopranos here?). ‘When one is going through issues, one generally feels like one cannot deal with the daily routine, hence fantasy shows make that daily routine into what it actually feels like: battaling demons and fighting wars. (again, I’m smelling Sopranos). In fact, usually if you have androids in a show, the whole damn show is about what it means to be human, analyzing the human condition and the human experience.

    I’ll give you one crumb: yes the characters in more “realistic” shows are subject to the same physical laws. This does make a difference in how we relate to them. You know I’m all for the “slice of life” shows, I really like them. One needs both the fantasy and the reality. I’m not saying that I dislike reality based stuff, or that it’s wrong to like it more than fantasy, I’m just saying your reasoning behind some of your distaste is faulty.

    Though again with the Sopranos - they have the same physical laws but not the same legal/societal laws. Most people I know that kill that much do get caught. Not that I know people that kill that much…

    Comment by tania — June 13, 2007 @ 10:49 am

  4. Ok I am at work so this is a quick and possibly purely reactive response but lets see where it goes. I’ll give you the point on the reality shows. It is quite possibly that nothing has ever dominated television to the same extent and yes one could rant on forever on these esp Home Makeover which could be more appropriately be called Tearful Contractors Build New Expensive Houses with Swimming Pools for Disabled Weeping Born Again Christians with Extended Unlucky Families. And maybe it was because I have already ranted so much about that, or simply that that particular pile of shit is so large that it formed the landscape that these other genres stood out in relief against.

    But as to how much fantasy on television,I suspect over 15 right now though I do not have my tv guide at hand. Dead Like Me, that thing with telepathic Patricia Arquette solving crimes, the Collector (collects or saves souls), and if needed I will expand.

    And I do not buy the “Spiderman” argument about them being just like us and having all the same problems. I think you are discounting the importance of the mortal and bounded body (ooh that was almost pomo lit talk). To be subject to sickness, injury and aging is essential to a realistic relationship to the world. I will have to think about this more and I am sure with your greater knowledge of fantasy etc that you will have counterexamples but we are talking about television here, not the full expression of the genre. It is quite possible that television has served drama much better than fantasy. It certainly has a dismal record concerning science fiction.

    And just a small note re the Sopranos. I went through a “its overhyped” period with that show but I am now convinced it is much better than I gave it credit for. One of the things that turned me was that a central character (Paulie) perhaps one of the most repellant characters ever, does not get his comeuppance. Every show I was hoping and it just never happened and I thought…yes, that is like life. As well, most of the killers on this show have met their ends in one way or another.

    I do have a tv set and sometimes I wonder if that is a good thing….seems like this particular universe is composed of a few diamonds in a large cesspool. The good stuff is so good but most of it is so bad.

    Comment by aos — June 13, 2007 @ 11:46 am

  5. [...] Television interlude; or I see dead shows Television: ok, so I am watching some stuff Television: watching the aliens This Hour has 22 Minutes: Youtube highlights Trailer park: April 17, 2008. 20 minutes into Inland Empire [...]

    Pingback by FilmPage: Film and Television Bibliography: Articles « Revenge of the Castanets — April 17, 2008 @ 3:49 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.